|
Two of the most
important
questions now
being debated in
the U.S. are the
effects of
globalization
and immigration
on the nation’s
economy.
Globalization is
accelerating,
and it is still
not clear
whether trends
like
outsourcing
will erode U.S.
competitiveness
or provide
long-term
benefits. The
focus of the
immigration
debate is on the
plight of
millions of
unskilled
immigrants who
have entered the
U.S. illegally.
Forgotten in
this debate are
the hundreds of
thousands of
skilled
immigrants that
enter the
country legally.
A
new study shows
these skilled
immigrants
provide the U.S.
a greater global
edge. They
contribute to
the economy,
create jobs, and
lead innovation.
Immigrants are
fueling the
creation of
hi-tech business
across our
nation and
creating a
wealth of
intellectual
property.
The
study also
raises a concern
– an increasing
percentage of
our
international
patents are
being filed by
foreign
nationals who
may not be here
to stay.
The
research
conducted by my
students at Duke
University in
collaboration
with Dean
AnnaLee Saxenian
of the
University of
California,
Berkeley was
titled,
“America’s New
Immigrant
Entrepreneurs.”
We interviewed
2,054
engineering and
technology
companies
started in the
U.S. between
1995 and 2005.
Here is what we
found:
--
In 25.3% of
these companies,
at least one key
founder was
foreign-born.
--
Nationwide,
these immigrant
founded
companies
produced $52
billion in sales
and employed
450,000 workers
in 2005.
--
Indians have
founded more
engineering and
technology
companies in the
U.S. in the past
decade than
immigrants from
Britain, China,
Taiwan, and
Japan combined.
Of all immigrant
founded
companies, 26%
have Indian
founders.
--
The mix of
immigrants
varies by state.
Hispanics
constitute the
dominant group
in Florida,
Israelis
constitute the
largest founding
group in
Massachusetts,
and Indians
dominate New
Jersey, with 47%
of all immigrant
founded
startups.
--
Almost 80% of
immigrant
founded
companies in the
U.S. were within
just two
industry fields
– software and
innovation/manufacturing-related
services.
Immigrants were
least likely to
start companies
in the
defense/aerospace
and
environmental
industries.
We
also analyzed
the patents
filed by U.S.
residents in the
World
Intellectual
Property
Organization
patent
databases. These
are patents that
give us a global
edge. We found
that foreign
nationals
residing in the
U.S. were named
as inventors or
co-inventors in
24.2% of
international
patent
applications
filed from the
U.S. in 2006. In
1998, by
contrast, this
number stood at
only 7.3%. To
put these
numbers into
perspective, it
is worth noting
that Indians and
Chinese both
constitute less
than one percent
of the U.S.
population, and
census data show
that 81.8% of
Indian
immigrants
arrived in the
U.S. after 1980.
These immigrants
come to the U.S.
with a good
understanding of
their home
markets and have
fresh
perspectives.
Given that we
are going to be
increasingly
competing with
the countries
they immigrate
from, their
knowledge of the
global landscape
is an asset.
Bringing in more
skilled
immigrants will
likely lead to
greater economic
growth and
create a greater
intellectual
property and
competitive
advantage. The
question is how
do we get them
here to stay?
Proponents of a
temporary visa
category called
the H1B argue
that we should
greatly expand
the numbers of
such visas. They
say these visas
provide a steady
flow of highly
skilled
professionals
who are in short
supply, and
reduce the need
for them to
move their
operations
abroad.
Opponents argue
that these visas
are often
misused to bring
in workers that
don’t have
exceptional
skills, and that
this can impact
wages and hurt
the engineering
profession
itself.
Both
sides are
correct. My view
is that if we do
need workers
with special
skills, we
should offer
them permanent
residence rather
than short-term
visas. Temporary
workers can’t
start
businesses, and
don’t have the
incentive to
help us compete
globally or to
integrate into
American
society. They
can’t sink deep
roots because
their visas
limit how long
they can stay.
The
patent data
reveals another
issue – the
percentage of
foreign
nationals
contributing to
U.S.
international
patent
applications
increased 331%
in eight years.
This is a
welcome
contribution to
U.S.
intellectual
property, but
many of the
engineers and
scientists
filing these
patents may have
to return home –
taking their
knowledge and
experience with
them. The
increasing
numbers of
patent filings
by foreigners
correspond to
the increasing
numbers of
foreign graduate
and
post-graduate
students and
skilled
temporary
workers that
come to the U.S.
The
current backlog
for skilled
immigrants from
India and China
in the third
preference
category (under
which they would
get permanent
residence)
stands at nearly
six years. In
other words, the
Immigration and
Naturalization
Service is
currently
processing
applications for
those who
applied for
permanent
residence in
2001.
Additionally,
there is a
yearly limit of
140,000
employment-based
visas, with a
maximum of 7%
being allocated
to immigrants
from any one
country. We have
tight limits on
how many skilled
immigrants can
come here and
only allow the
same numbers
from India as
from Poland and
Senegal.
So,
after educating
the world’s best
and brightest
and providing
them with
extensive
experience in
American
business, we are
now setting the
stage to force
them to return
to their home
countries –
where they could
become our
competitors.
What
we need to do is
to open the
doors wider for
the skilled
immigrants we
need. Let’s try
to keep the
brightest
students who
complete their
graduate studies
in our
universities by
making them
eligible for
green cards.
Let’s expand the
numbers of
skilled
immigrants we
admit, remove
the arbitrary
country limits
and make it
easier for those
that contribute
to our economy
and
competitiveness
to stay.
After all, we
want these
people on our
side.
RF
Vivek Wadhwa is
a skilled Indian
immigrant who
moved to the
U.S. in 1980.
The founder of
two software
companies, he is
presently an
Executive in
Residence at
Duke University.
A complete copy
of the Duke
University study
he coauthored
can be found
online at
http://memp.pratt.duke.edu/news/?id=829. |