|
In
his best
enlightened,
post-pejorative,
bipartisan
manner, Lawrence
H. Summers,
President
Obama’s chief
economic
advisor,
dismissed
Republican
efforts to
modify the
stimulus package
on Capitol Hill
saying, “Those
who presided
over the last
eight years, the
eight years that
brought us to
the point where
we inherit
trillions of
dollars of
deficit, an
economy that’s
collapsing more
rapidly than at
any time in the
last 50 years,
don’t seem to me
in a strong
position
to lecture about
the lessons of
history.”
The premise
that recent
history
undermines
the
Republican’s
economic
proposals
deserves
examination
by the
numbers. In
particular,
the record
of
Republican
majorities
on Capitol
Hill versus
the
Democratic
majorities
of the last
two
Congresses
should be
carefully
scrutinized.
Let’s look
first at
deficit
spending
since Mr.
Summers used
that as the
principal
example of
Republican
malfeasance.
When
Republicans
took
control of
Congress in
1995 after
40 years of
Democratic
control of
the U. S.
House of
Representatives,
the
Federal
deficit
stood at
$164
billion.
Six years
later in
January,
2001, when
George W.
Bush was
assuming the
presidency,
the deficit
had been
erased and
the Federal
budget had a
$128.2
billion
surplus.
Democrats
have tried
to make the
case that
the huge
deficit
turnaround
resulted
from Clinton
Administration
policies
including
the tax
increases
early in
President
Clinton’s
term. But
such claims
ignore the
fact that
the budget
projections
in 1995
showed $200
billion
dollar
deficits for
as far as
the eye
could see.
Republican
talk about
balanced
budgets was
routinely
dismissed as
unattainable
and even
silly. The
change of
congressional
power was
the driving
force that
created
balanced
budgets and
even
surpluses
within six
years.
No one
disputes
that
success.
Mr. Summers
and others
want to
focus on the
eight years
of the Bush
presidency
when
Republicans
controlled
both the
White House
and the
Congress.
Fair
enough. In
January,
2007 when
the
Democrats
took control
of both
houses of
Congress,
the Federal
budget
deficit
stood at
$161
billion.
Yes, the
surplus was
gone;
Republicans
had engaged
in too much
spending and
had paid a
political
price for so
doing. But,
in reality,
the budget
deficit was
still
slightly
below what
they had
inherited in
1995.
With the
Democrats in
control of
Congress and
President
Bush still
in the White
House, the
deficits
swelled out
of control.
By January
2009, the
Federal red
numbers had
gone to $455
billion in
actual 2008
deficit and
to a
projected
$1.2
trillion as
a 2009
projection.
What
changed? The
only
change was
the control
of Congress
and with
that change
of control,
the renewed
emphasis on
tax
increases,
additional
spending,
and more
regulation.
But
deficits,
despite Mr.
Summer’s
prioritization
of them do
not tell the
whole story
of the
damage done
to the
economy by
two years of
Democratic
dominance on
Capitol
Hill. We
should look
at some
other
telling data
and measure
Congress by
the
numbers.
In January
1995, the
unemployment
rate was 5.6
percent. In
January
2007, when
Republicans
lost control
of Congress,
the rate had
dropped to
4.6
percent. In
other words,
during the
Republican
era of
congressional
control, the
GOP had
achieved
what many
economists
regard as a
full
employment
level. In
December
2008, after
just 23
months of
Democratic
control on
Capitol
Hill, the
actual
unemployment
figure was
7.2 percent
with a
projected
January 2009
estimate of
8.3 percent.
“…during the
Republican
era of
congressional
control, the
GOP had
achieved
what many
economists
regard as a
full
employment
level. In
December
2008, after
just 23
months of
Democratic
control on
Capitol
Hill, the
actual
unemployment
figure was
7.2 percent
with a
projected
January 2009
estimate of
8.3
percent.”
So, how
about
measuring
economic
growth? In
January
1995, the
GDP was
growing at a
nominal rate
of 3.66
percent.
That rate
had nearly
doubled to
6.88 percent
by January
2007. In
October
2008, (the
last
official
measurement)
that same
rate stood
at a minus
4.11
percent,
nearly a 10
point drop,
and has
gotten worse
since.
But the real
telling
figure on
whose
economic
theories
work the
best may
rest with
the Dow
Jones
Industrial
Average.
After 40
straight
years of
Democrats in
Congress
working with
both
Republican
and
Democratic
Presidents,
the DJIA was
3838.48 in
January
1995.
During 12
years of
Republicans
working with
a Democratic
President
and a
Republican
President,
the Dow
Jones
swelled to
12474.53
-- more than
a 300
percent
increase.
After just
two years of
Democrats
replacing
Republican
control of
Congress,
the Dow
stood at
8116.03 on
January 26,
2009 --
about
a 35 percent
drop.
So whose
economic
history in
recent years
is better?
The numbers
tell the
story.
Republicans
can be
faulted for
failing to
hold the
line on
spending and
the use of
earmarks to
drive that
spending
spree during
the period
2001-2007.
They
compounded
their
spending
with a
series of
ethical
issues and
the result
was lost
political
credibility.
But the
Democrats
who replaced
them
immediately
began to
talk down
the
economy.
They made
clear they
intended to
allow
previously
enacted tax
cuts to
expire.
They sought
to raise
revenue with
new taxes on
investments
and
capital.
They
proposed
increased
costs to the
economy with
more
regulation
and expense
aimed most
devastatingly
at the small
business
sector, for
instance,
the increase
in the
minimum
wage. And,
in the end,
Democrats
convinced
investors
that the
future was
not growth
oriented,
but growth
agnostic.
The result
was that
investors
began moving
their money
to other
safer and
more tax
protected
instruments.
Today
we can
measure, by
the numbers,
the two
years
2007-08, of
congressional
economic
performance
and it is
stunningly
inept.
House
Financial
Services
Committee
Chairman
Barney Frank
(D-MA)
faults
Republicans
for the
economic
mess that
the country
faces. He
recently
said on Meet
the Press
criticizing
Senator John
Ensign for
his critique
of
overspending
in the
stimulus
bill, “On
the bloated
spending,
this comes
from a man
whose party
controlled
the federal
government
—
House,
Senate and
White House
—
for
six years.”
But now we
know the
numbers tell
the real
story.
It is the
last two
years when
Democrats
controlled
the Congress
that the
economy
truly went
in the
tank. Larry
Summers and
Barney Frank
may believe
that recent
economic
history is
on their
side. But
you cannot
prove it by
the numbers.
--###--
Robert S.
Walker
represented
Pennsylvania’s
16th
District in
the U.S.
House of
Representatives
from 1977 to
1997. He is
currently
the
Executive
Chairman of
Wexler and
Walker
Public
Policy
Associates.
|