|
One of the most
important duties
entrusted to
Congress is
budgeting.
Congress must
guard against an
oversized
bureaucracy and
wasteful
spending, while
supporting
effective
programs and
preserving the
hard-earned
dollars of our
nation’s
taxpayers.
Regrettably, our
government has
historically
spent more than
we have taken
in. To make
matters worse,
we are
ill-equipped to
handle an aging
U.S. population,
an increasing
life expectancy
and the rising
cost of
healthcare, all
of which will
put severe
pressure on the
federal budget
over the coming
decades. Massive
projected growth
in entitlement
programs such as
Social Security,
Medicare, and
Medicaid will
create a
situation in
which economic
growth alone is
unlikely to
mitigate the
expanding
deficit.
Tackling the
federal budget
deficit is no
easy task. As
Nicholas Gregory
Mankiw, a former
chairman of
President Bush’s
Council of
Economic
Advisors, noted,
“policy options
aren’t pretty –
either large
cuts in promised
benefits or
taxes vastly
higher than
anything ever
experienced in
U.S. history.”
Additionally,
partisan
politics have
often prevented
meaningful
dialogue on the
problem.
In an August
28th op-ed in
The Washington
Post, former
Senators Bob
Kerrey and
Warren Rudman
aptly described
the partisan
quandary.
“Neither party
wants to be the
first to propose
these tough
choices out of
fear that the
other side would
attack it,” they
wrote.
“Similarly,
neither side
wants to discuss
possible
compromises of
its own
priorities, out
of fear that the
other side will
take the
concessions and
run.” Thus, it
has become
glaringly clear
that we must
explore new and
inventive
approaches that
will bypass
partisan
politics and
help us find a
solution to the
flood of debt on
the horizon.
This is
precisely why I
have decided to
become a
cosponsor of the
Securing
America’s Future
Economy (SAFE)
Commission Act.
In the same
August op-ed,
Senators Kerrey
and Rudman
endorse the SAFE
Commission Act.
Proposed by
Senator George
Voinovich and
Congressman
Frank Wolf, the
legislation
seeks to
overcome the
political
difficulties
associated with
tackling
long-term reform
of fiscal
policy. Under
the plan, a
commission of
bipartisan
experts on
budget and
economic
policies will be
tasked with
studying,
identifying, and
recommending
solutions to the
long-term fiscal
challenges
facing the
United States.
Based on their
analysis and the
crucial input of
the public at
town hall
meetings
throughout the
country, the
Commission will
put all options
on the table and
craft
legislation. In
particular, they
will seek to
address the
following: the
imbalance
between longterm
federal spending
commitments and
projected
revenues;
stimulating
domestic
investment and
economic growth
through
increased
national
savings; and,
improving the
budget process
to place greater
emphasis on
long-term fiscal
issues.
The President
and Congress
will each have
sufficient time
to review the
Commission’s
legislation and
develop
alternative
proposals if
they deem it
necessary. One
important
hallmark of this
legislation is
that, unlike
most commissions
whose work often
goes unnoticed,
the final
product of the
SAFE Commission
will see action
when Congress
casts a required
up-or-down vote
on the
recommendations
and any other
proposals put on
the table.
The commission
approach has
proved
successful in
addressing the
fiscal
imbalance of
spending and
entitlements. In
1981, Congress
and the
President
appointed The
National
Commission on
Social Security
Reform, better
known as the
“Greenspan
Commission,” to
study and make
recommendations
on how best to
solve the Social
Security crisis.
That approach
shaped a
bipartisan
dialogue and
formed the basis
for the
enactment of the
Social Security
Amendments of
1983 which made
significant
changes to the
program and
enhanced
long-term
solvency. This
type of
bipartisan
approach should
again be
considered to
evaluate the
looming problems
facing our
nation with
respect to its
long-term fiscal
health.
Supporting the
SAFE Commission
Act is
consistent with
my previous
efforts to enact
economic and
budget process
reforms to
ensure fiscal
discipline,
protect against
wasteful
spending, and
simplify the tax
code. In 1996, I
strongly
supported giving
the President
the authority to
veto specific
line items in
appropriations
bills. However,
that law was
subsequently
ruled
unconstitutional
by the U.S.
Supreme Court in
1998. In 1997, I
was an original
cosponsor of an
amendment to the
Constitution of
the United
States to
require a
balanced budget.
This would force
the President
and Congress to
determine
priorities and
pass a
responsible
budget based on
the resources
available.
Unfortunately,
enactment of
this tool fell
one vote short
of the
constitutionally
required 67
votes in the
Senate. In 1995,
I introduced the
first bill in
the Senate that
would create a
Federal flat tax
and completely
replace current
tax provisions
with an
across-the-board
20 percent
Federal tax on
the income of
individuals and
businesses. I
have included
provisions in
this bill that
would eliminate
the estate tax
as well as the
tax on
dividends.
The need to
ensure the
federal budget
is on a
sustainable path
comes into sharp
focus for me
when I consider
the future of my
four
grandchildren.
My wife Joan and
I would never
consider
imposing our
financial
obligations on
them, or
spending money
on their credit
cards for them
to pay at some
later date. But
that is
precisely what
we have done as
a society.
Unfortunately,
partisan
politics often
gets in the way
of having a
candid dialogue
on controlling
federal
spending.
The SAFE
Commission Act
would help
overcome that by
providing expert
analysis of the
situation. In
the process, it
would set the
stage for a
meaningful, fair
debate on how
best to confront
our rising
national debt.
RF
Arlen Specter
is the senior
United States
Senator from
Pennsylvania. |