|
As
Republicans
prepare to
select their
nominee for
President in
2008, it is
a good time
to reflect
on the one
decision
that
probably did
more to
shape the
GOP than any
other
decision in
the Party’s
history –
the decision
by Abraham
Lincoln to
become a
Republican.
It was not a
decision
that Lincoln
took
lightly. He
was a
staunch
member of
the Whig
Party up
until that
point. Yet
events in
the country
caused him
to change
course.
Indeed, the
birth of the
Republican
Party and
Lincoln’s
transformation
from a local
Midwestern
politician
to the
greatest
American
President
are
intimately
connected to
the
extraordinary
tumult of
mid-19th
century
America.
Any effort
to consider
why Lincoln
became a
Republican
and his role
in the
formation of
the
Republican
Party must
begin with
two basic
points.
First, a
single issue
united early
Republicans
– strenuous
objection to
the
extension of
slavery into
the
territories.
Second,
Lincoln’s
passion was
always for
the
principles
of liberty
in the
Declaration
of
Independence,
especially
the
principle
that “all
men are
created
equal.”
Lincoln
abhorred
slavery, a
position
that led him
to the
Republican
Party. Once
a
Republican,
his broader
philosophy
made its
mark on the
party.
Lincoln was
a moderate
in a radical
party. His
Whig roots
and his
faith in
America’s
founding
principles
made him an
eloquent
spokesman
for the
Republicans.
Lincoln was
attracted to
the party by
his
unwavering
faith in the
ideas
espoused in
the
Declaration
of
Independence,
even when
faced with
civil war.
He was no
partisan
zealot. He
simply
recognized
that “the
man who is
of neither
party, is
not — cannot
be, of any
consequence.”
Above all,
Lincoln’s
loyalty was
to the Union
and its
founding
ideals.
The story of
the first
Republican
presidency
begins with
the divisive
Kansas-Nebraska
Act of 1854,
which
abrogated
the Missouri
Compromise
and ignited
fears that
Kansas or
Nebraska
might join
the Union as
slave
states. An
“anti-Nebraska”
movement,
soon to
become the
new
Republican
Party, took
shape across
the North.
Lincoln was
not
initially
inclined to
align with
the Party,
even though
he was
invited to
be member of
its central
committee in
1854. He
declined the
invitation,
claiming he
was still a
Whig.
As it was,
Whigs were
becoming
less
relevant
because they
refused to
face the
growing
crisis over
slavery.
Finally, in
1856,
Lincoln
attended
Illinois’s
anti-Nebraska
conference
and
announced
his desire
to run for
the United
States
Senate. He
helped
organize the
first
convention
of the
Illinois
Republican
Party,
closing the
convention
with a
speech
“universally
acclaimed as
the best
speech of
his life.”
Later, his
name was
offered as a
vice-presidential
candidate at
the 1856
Republican
National
Convention.
He did not
receive the
nomination,
however, and
returned to
Illinois to
continued
prominence
in the state
party.
In 1857, the
Supreme
Court handed
down the
infamous
Dred Scott
decision in
which Chief
Justice
Taney
declared
that blacks
“had no
rights which
the white
man was
bound to
respect.”
The Dred
Scott
decision
asserted
that the
Declaration
of
Independence
did not
apply to
blacks.
This
decision was
offensive to
Lincoln and
acted as a
catalyst for
him to
reenter the
national
debate.
In 1858, the
Illinois
Republican
Party
nominated
him for the
United
States
Senate.
During this
campaign,
Lincoln
participated
in the
now-legendary
series of
debates with
his
political
rival and
the
incumbent
Democratic
Senator,
Stephen A.
Douglas. In
these
debates and
throughout
the
campaign, he
perfected
his moral
rhetoric on
the question
of slavery,
defining it
as an
eternal
struggle
between two
opposing
rights.
“The one is
the common
right of
humanity,”
he declared,
“the other
the divine
right of
kings.”
Despite his
soaring
rhetoric,
Lincoln was
defeated by
Douglas in
the
election.
But his
defeat set
the stage
for the
presidential
election of
1860.
Lincoln
emerged as
the only
Republican
candidate
who could
unify the
fractured
elements of
his young
party. His
election to
the White
House was
secured
against a
divided
opposition
in the
South,
making Civil
War all but
inevitable.
Lincoln’s
rise to the
Presidency,
his
achievements
once in
office, and
his eventual
success in
keeping the
country
together
transcend
party
politics.
His memory
belongs to
the history
of the
nation, and
in some
sense the
history of
democracy
itself, not
a political
party. It
is only
natural that
Republicans
today would
wonder about
the lasting
impact on
their party
of such a
colossal
figure. The
answer
begins with
Lincoln’s
original
decision to
leave the
Whigs and
become a
Republican.
Lincoln was
hesitant to
leave the
Whig party,
so it only
makes sense
to consider
the
influence of
his long
held
Whiggish
principles.
Lincoln,
after all,
attracted
many former
Whigs to the
party. Who
were the
Whigs?
Above all,
they were
economic
optimists
who believed
wholeheartedly
in the power
of the
individual
to better
himself, so
long as
society was
properly
ordered.
In Lincoln’s
words,
“[E]very man
can make
himself.”
His strongly
held notions
of liberty
combined
with his
“self-made
man” ideal
led
naturally
and
forcefully
to the right
of free
labor. This
provided
Lincoln with
a natural
transition
from Whig to
Republican.
It also
provided the
GOP with a
philosophical
underpinning
that remains
critical to
its
political
identity.
Lincoln’s
powerful
influence on
his young
party helped
transform
Republicanism
from a
single issue
party to one
devoted to
broader
ideals of
liberty and
optimism.
His
influence
brought
success to
the
anti-slavery
cause and
transformed
it into an
enduring
political
party still
relevant
today.
Times have
certainly
changed
since
Lincoln’s
day, and now
everyone
takes
Lincoln as
their own:
liberals,
conservatives,
labor, and
business;
but he
remains the
quintessential
Republican.
For his
part,
Lincoln
became a
Republican
because he
believed
people are
at their
best when
they are
free.
One hundred
and sixty
one years
later, that
sentiment
has become a
bedrock
principle of
our Nation
and has
taken hold
around the
world, as
well.
RF
Frank J.
Williams is
a life-long
student of
the life and
times of
Abraham
Lincoln. He
is also the
Chief
Justice of
the Supreme
Court of
Rhode
Island and
the founding
chair of The
Lincoln
Forum, an
international
organization
devoted to
the study of
Abraham
Lincoln and
the Civil
War. A
member of
the U.S.
Lincoln
Bicentennial
Commission,
he is the
author of
the 2002
book,
“Judging
Lincoln.” He
would like
to thank
Terrence
Haas, Esq.
for his
research
assistance
on this
essay. This
article is
purely
historical
and does not
represent
the
political
views of the
author. |